jump to navigation

Thank you Keith January 21, 2011

Posted by WillardWhyte in Communications, hope, Justice, Politics.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

for raising your voice, though there were times it topped the wall to my ears.

But right or wrong, you spoke for truth … and against the pretty narrative, the brazen grab, the bald-faced bulbous lie.

And too many just take the money and cower.

And above all else, I always got the sense that you felt that you could be wrong. As we all are on occasion.

So rest up for a bit and see and hear and taste and feel the world. Then tell us all again sometime how it all boils down to your mind.

We’ll be waiting.

Advertisements

Our Senate has some oddball logic December 18, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Justice, Politics.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

I’m pleased to see that the Senate finally voted to get rid of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy governing military service. It’s a step toward facing up to one of the realities in our make-up as a nation — the one where we all are differently blessed, differently obligated.

Even those who might profess that homosexuality is a sin had no leg to stand on with this wink toward injustice. For if we barred sinners from military service, or fair treatment after military service, I’m guessing the Pentagon and Veterans Affairs budgets dip to near zero.

But I’m left shaking my head by votes from Republican Sens. John Ensign of Nevada and Richard Burr of North Carolina. These two stalwarts joined the supermajority in removing the policy. But not before they voted in lockstep with most Republicans to block a vote on the matter with what passes for a filibuster today.

What’s that all about? I don’t really want to vote, but if we’re going to I’m for it? On an issue such as this, that rises or falls on a principle, you go for that kind of stuff — it’s more important to stand with my “team” and try to block consideration of such an important matter, even though I’m in favor of the matter and want my vote counted publicly as an “Ay?”

That’s the wrong message gentlemen: The people want matters to get full consideration, discussion, debate and then a vote.

We tire of these kind of games — and fancy footwork who you can pull a John Kerry someday and be for it and against it.

Grab your stones and stand for something.

Yes, let’s put Goldman back in charge December 4, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Economy, Environment, Justice, Politics, U.S. Budget, Wall Street.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

I’ve been listening very very closely to all the reform talk down in the Swamp, emerging only with confusion.

One group – the bright Red one – rails against an end to what always was limited tax relief for the top 1 percent or 2 percent of earners, now casting any act to not extend this relief as a move that would sap the slow 3 percent recovery we are in the midst of. Can’t take that $80-$100 billion a year out of circulation in what they continue to say is a “recession,” even though the economy stopped receding and started proceeding four quarters ago.

They know that. But they lie because it’s convenient for the narrative.

This group, then, does a wonderful spin with full gainer, and demands an end to extended unemployment benefits and an immediate return to 2008 spending levels, reigning in such stimulus-intended measures as broadened Medicaid coverage, boosted university research grants, various individual tax credits designed to spur household spending on energy efficiency upgrades. This, if put into effect, would take at least $100 billion in spending by individuals out of the economy – spending on doctors, medicines, researcher salaries and equipment purchases and all those things all those people scraping by need to buy. You know, rent, milk, bread, gasoline, spaghetti sauce, mostly from small businesses, if that matters (actually, the Wal-Marts are counting on taking that “market share” pretty soon, so it doesn’t long term).

Somehow, the Red team doesn’t think this will in any way slow down the economic expansion, though study after study show without dispute that the poor and unemployed and even the middle class university research assistant have a much higher propensity to spend than does the individual or couple making $250,000 and up. So if you are going to pull $100 billion out of the economy – and either way you are doing that – and your true intention is to not hurt the recovery, you draw from the top, not the bottom, of the take-home ladder, because the subtraction of spending multiplied down the line is less.

(more…)

We need to see a lot more of this November 25, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Justice, Politics.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

Tom DeLay. Guilty of felony crimes, punishable by time in prison.

He didn’t rob a bank, assault a neighbor, abuse a child. He saw a law he didn’t like, determined he would find a way to do what it outlawed and — in complete contempt of the rule of law and of We the People who put it in place — used his position of public trust to twist the democratic system to favor himself and his followers. He subverted the system we hold dear.

Oh he did that in a relatively small way. And maybe the money he manipulated unlawfully made no difference in the voting. Maybe his cause and the people fighting for it are angels sent to do just that. Not mine to judge all that.

But he broke the law, intentionally. And that is NOT politics as usual. That is a shard in a scrap heap of immorality, injustice and base corruption of souls that permeates our nation’s capital to this day, deeply encrusts our capital markets and commerce and eats away a little more each day at the greatness of our democratic experiment.

Deficits are a problem. Unemployment and slow growth are a problem. Costly inefficient healthcare is a problem. Unproductive and violent citizens are a problem.

But fixing the moral mess must be Job 1. Because if we do not address the lawlessness — the fraud, the theft, the arrogant abuse of position — nothing lasting and just can be done with anything we tackle no matter how earnest our efforts are. The rot will eat away at those fixes also, in time.

A lot of this involves long and expensive investigations, prosecutions and pursuit of appeals to make the point again and again in realm after realm that there is a “right” and a “wrong” way to live, to earn, to govern. And there are real and somewhat immediate consequences for breaking the law. Without this type of deterrence, justice will submit to power and liberty is at risk.

But a lot of this falls to us, also. We cannot abide people who act in this manner, who scoff at laws and make their own rules. Not when they hold an opposite political view — and most importantly not when they share our view and seek to carry a banner we follow.

No manner how smooth, no matter how glib, no matter how gifted they seem, if their soul is thusly corrupted by arrogance, pride and lust for power, they must be cast aside. For within our ranks — Red, Blue or in that vast sea in between — there are far better hands for the task, far better tunics to pin our hopes upon.

We must just say ‘no’ to the dishonest ones, if we are to fix what needs fixing.

Serious business for the infantile November 20, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Economy, Greed, Politics, U.S. Budget, Wall Street.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

Exactly when did these two guys — Simpson in particular — become the ultimate in Wise Men?

And from this piece, there seems to be a whole lot of chortling going on over the potential ruination of the U.S. economy if their particular strategy for reducing the deficit — and radically overhauling the entire tax code with little assessment of impact — is not swallowed pretty much whole. Get this:

“I can’t wait for the bloodbath in April,” Simpson said, relishing the prospect of political turmoil. “When debt limit time comes, they’re going to look around and say, ‘What in the hell do we do now? We’ve got guys who will not approve the debt limit extension unless we give ‘em a piece of meat, real meat” in the form of spending cuts. “And boy, the bloodbath will be extraordinary,” he said.

Extraordinary indeed. It’s all a game to him too — the graying, dottering Fox can’t wait for the Hen House to catch fire.

Shameful.

OK — this is a start, if you reject Coburn November 18, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Musings, Politics.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Bipartisanship and constructive collaboration often begins with the little things — rather, with the easier things. Ones with a shared objective, like this food safety bill that maybe can move.

And breaking the back of things that sow the seeds of discontent also can start with smaller steps — like flatly rejecting the “Christmas Tree” approach to lawmaking Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) would employ here. It’s back-door lawmaking and it needs to stop — tacking an amendment onto a bill that looks like a good thing, hoping to either kill it with a “poison pill” or piggyback something through you are not forthright enough to put to a vote on its own merits.

Coburn wants an earmark clause on a food safety bill.

Just say ‘no’ to this sort of crap.  If an amendment is not germane to the matters considered in the main bill, it is trickery designed to confuse the matter, game the system or avoid a clear up-down legislative statement and, hence, out of order.

 

This is fun, but … November 14, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Economy, Politics, U.S. Budget.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

…after going through it and saving the nation from deficits through 2030 with mouse-clicks that took about 15 minutes, I find myself wondering about all the ramifications.

My ratio of spending cuts to tax increases was 61-39, and it did not seem like I was taking food out of the mouthes of babies, leaving infirm seniors by the side of the road with just a bone to gnaw on, or leaving the nation wide open to attack — now or a quarter-century from now.

Earmarks, farm subsidies, a 10% reduction in federal workforce and a 250,000 whack to government contractors, reducing troop levels ion South Asia and cutting non-combat military compensation and capping Medicare growth and reducing SS benefits to high-income folks all seemed like areas that could take trims.

Workforce/contractor reductions of 10% would about equal what has taken place in the private sector, with productivity expected to absorb workload. It surely would provide ample incentive to managers to find wasted effort, if only by having to prioritize the most productive tasks and workers. This is always artificial, so I would allow a manager to be able to save a position if he/she were able to identify permanent/verifiable savings equal to 110% of the full cost of that position  in salary and benefits.

Capping Medicare growth to GDP+1% also seemed reasonable, if very difficult. As medical costs will go up with sheer volume more than that, it requires a heavy hand, and that hand would need to find the waste and fraud in a hurry. A good whistleblower program is needed here.

On the tax side, I returned estate tax to 2009 level, with $3.5 million exemption; cut cap gains to Clinton-era levels; kept Bush tax cuts for all but those above $250,000; jacked payroll taxes back up to cover 90% of income (level at original enactment); converted mortgage interest deduction to credit); and enacted bank tax as a disincentive for risk.

I opted against a carbon tax (prefer market approach with cap-trade); a sales tax; millionaire’s tax; and complete loophole reduction.

I opted against the Bowles-Simpson complete wipe-out of “loopholes” because I am a believer in using the tax code, as well as the checkbook, to attempt to steer investment toward things deemed in the national interest — like energy independence, reinvestment of profits into R&D, individual incentives for education. Markets today are extremely short-term in their vision and the government needs to “help” money look longer.

That said, the tax code needs to be overhauled with a “zero-based budgeting” approach — each clause amounting to a “tax expenditure” must be justified after an exhaustive, neutral cost-benefit audit fully identifying where the crutch applies and why.

With all this said, I’ll say I have no idea whether this little graphic exercise created by the Times is “neutral” or “spun” to identify things a “progressive” would target, and not highlight as an option things a “conservative” might want as an option.

And I’d also say that it all kind of assumes all else could be ignored, which I don’t agree with as an approach.

Still, it is quite thought-provoking and worth the time I think, if for no other reason than to get familiar with what really might be “saved” by the various options on this list.  Things like the estate tax don’t really help close the huge gap all that much and might very well motivate hardship-sales of  enterprises best left in family hands. Perhaps another method would be better — such as a ceding of a non-voting ownership stake to a blind trust, with repurchase options to owners or their designees. Perhaps Treasury could pool the combined stake and sell slices into the open market, giving Uncle Sam the cash and shifting the risk/gain to global investors.

It would be nice, maybe, if the Wall Street Journal or Bloomberg joined with the Times in this venture to extend the choices (and in a manner of thinking also vetting the entire deal for “bias”). And perhaps each option could link to pro-con essays or more detailed studies of the risk/reward for each, allowing folks to better understand the pain/gain each choice involves.

Sort of a joint venture in education and reason.

 

You can tax me now — or tax me later November 11, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Economy, Politics.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

Twin stories from Bloomberg — here on Obama and there on Bernanke’s Bucks — have some unsettling news for the hundreds of millions out there waiting for an economic boost to follow the GOP ascent to House leadership, or from the Federal Reserve’s $600 billion buy of Treasuries.

Investors think they are going to get their cash reward with extended tax cuts, like the new climate for investments and see hope for a smaller U.S. budget deficit.

But the view is pessimistic when it comes to any GOP impact on the overall economy, job gains or credit.

And they think  — a whopping 76 percent of them — that Ben’s money move will have absolutely no effect on unemployment in the U.S. And by a 56-41 margin — with 3% too busy bidding up gold to answer — they said the Fed move would not bolster the U.S. economy in the coming year.

They know the purchasing power simply is not there — not across the board as it needs to be to sustain healthy production.

I say this and note this poll not to depress, but in the hope that it helps us all get to the place we need to be: One where we do not expect things to get radically better, radically soon — and govern our expectations well.

The devastation from the Crash of 2008 requires rebuilding the economy and we must demand from our elected officials plans for that — not snake oil promises or pledges or pablum suggesting they can do this overnight.

They can’t — we can’t. Anyone who says they have a magic elixir is lying, rendering them part of the problem.

Oh — I forgot to mention that those investors don’t like Obama.

Gold bars, future oil, cotton ain’t gonna hire Joe the Plumber November 8, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Economy, Politics, Wall Street.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

I found this take on Ben’s money-move to be quite on target. This in particular from Richard Fisher, president of the Fed bank in Dallas:

I could envision such action would lead to a declining dollar, encouraging further speculation, provoking commodity hoarding, accelerate the transfer of wealth from the deliberate save and unfortunate, and possibly place at risk the stature and importance of the Fed.

But Ben knows this, just as he knows that the odds of monetary policy stimulating job growth and greater consumption in the U.S. are extremely long.  It’s his only play, knowing now the fiscal side is headed toward the austerity solution demanded by the voters, ostensibly. And that will take billions out of circulation in 6-8 months.

With no new wage growth on the horizon at anything but the top end, throwing accelerant on commodities and equities and potential bubbles abroad is intentioally destablizing, a sort of drop-the-gloves-and-hope-the-sparks-fly approach that depends on some of the embers landing in the deadwood and warming many.

But Ben undervalues the monkey still perched on the back of money markets —  the jonesing for fast money made with money, not output of goods and services in demand. The dice and spinning wheels and flashing lights still draw the biggest crowd, and garner the loudest roars from the onlookers.

It’s going to help some folks make a good chunk of change on the house, Ben. That’s about it, because a “real job” is still the chump play.

The folks sitting on the mounds of cash are not coming off until your cheap money is all gone and it becomes clear the only way to make money is the old-fashioned way.

Funny, didn’t hear about this on Monday November 4, 2010

Posted by WillardWhyte in Economy, Greed, Politics.
Tags: , , , ,
1 comment so far

The guy set to take over the House Financial Services Committee — which oversees agencies regulating banks — shows what’s tops on his agenda: Rolling back financial reforms to let the banks back into high-stake gambling with U.S. government insured deposits. That’s long for: Your money and mine, “insured” by your tax dollars and mine.

Reuters is here and Salon is here. Here’s a quote from Rep. Spencer Bachus’ letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and other top regulators, who are writing rules they were ordered to write by the financial reform law passed last spring.

I strongly recommend that your study of the Volcker Rule take account of how trading activities fit into the core business plan of global banks, as well as the consequences for U.S. banks and the banks’ clients of prohibiting those activities in the U.S. while they continue to be permitted everywhere else in the world.

Funny — I’ve read that five times now and I must have missed the part about you and me and how the Volcker Rule would be bad for us and getting rid of it would create jobs.

Well Butch, we’ll get to all you cowpokes out there after we make things better for Wells Fargo.